Latest Blog Posts

Monmouth and Ocean County residents looking for the highest quality in dental care need to look no further than their own backyard.  In the latest issue of NJ Monthly Magazine, approximately 40 dentists from Monmouth and Ocean Counties were selected to be named to this year’s annual Top Dentists List.  Only 240 dentists total were named. 

 Dr Robert Sacks in Oakhurst NJ was named to this year’s list.  He is pleased to see that the talent and quality of dental care that exists in Monmouth County is finally being recognized.  “People naturally think that they need to travel North for a higher level of dental care.  Clearly, based on this survey, the level of care in Monmouth County is just as high as anywhere else in the state or even New York City, for that matter. “

 NJ Monthly magazine conducted the study.  According to the magazine, “New Jersey Monthly commissioned an independent survey of the state’s dentists by the Polling Institute at Monmouth University in West Long Branch. A total of 6,389 New Jersey-based dentists were invited to give their recommendations for this year’s list.”

A total of 1,229 unique votes were returned naming 240 NJ dentists to the Top Dentists List.  To see the entire list of NJ Top Doctors, visit http://njmonthly.com/articles/topdoctors/top-dentists-2009-general-dentistry.html

Dr Robert Sacks enjoys practicing cosmetic, restorative, and implant dentistry, with a focus on challenging cosmetic dental problems, smile design, and makeovers.   He uses veneers, porcelain jackets, bonding, and whitening,  to achieve  the desired results, and  has lectured extensively on  cosmetic dentistry.    For more information on his practice, visit http://sacksdental.com/  or email office@sacksdental.com

Consumers who have been locked out of the Car Allowance Rebate System are urged to join Brian Pasch and hundreds of Americans for a online petition project which will be sent to Congress.  Currently, consumers who own cars that are rated as averaging 19 MPG or more, based on government estimates, are not eligible for a CARS credit regardless of their actual miles per gallon experience. 

Consumers are disgruntled over the government’s standardized fuel ratings which are posted at http://www.fueleconomy.gov .  The fuel ratings do not take into consideration wear and tear to vehicles which prevents them from attaining the MPG numbers the vehicle was originally estimated to achieve. 

Brian Pasch, CEO of the PCG Digital Marketing, has created the petition to provide a place meeting place for consumers to unify their voices.  Over 600 consumers have added their name to the petition in the first two weeks that the site was opened.

Most consumers understand that the NHTSA is only responsible for implementing the program and is not responsible for the restrictions of the bill.  What they don’t know is how to make their voices heard in Congress.  The petition was created to help that process.

Cash for Clunkers Petition Website

The website, http://www.nocashforclunkers.com/ , is taking comments from consumers who want their voices heard.  By joining the online petition, consumers will add their names to the petition list that will be sent to the original sponsors of the Cash for Clunkers legislation.  The goal is to make sure Congress hears their voices and those of frustrated consumers around the country if additional funding is requested. 

The most common complaint from consumers is that the Federal website rates their “clunker” at 19, 20 or 21 combined mpg.  Consumers are adamant that their vehicle’s condition prevents it from getting anywhere near that mpg number.  For example, one reader wrote in to the site, “I have a 2001 Infiniti I-30 with 220,000 miles. The EPA MPG says I am getting 20 mpg. That is a joke. I have 220,000 miles on my car. I would be lucky to be operating at 18 mpg.”  These types of complaints are flooding the www.CashForClunkersFacts.com blog site. 

Another consumer wrote, “Regarding the Car Allowance Rebate System. I currently drive a 1995 model car that I have owned for 12 years. According to the website fueleconomy.gov, it has a “new” mpg rating of 20 which means that I do not qualify for the CARS program. The MPG when the car was new was 22. This is disappointing as I do not understand how a change of ONLY 2 mpg is calculated on a 14 year old vehicle!”

NET-10 Proposal

The ‘No Cash for Clunkers’ website suggests an alternative qualification model called:  NET-10.  If a consumer trades in their “clunker” for another new vehicle that gets at least 10 mpg  more than their current clunker, they would qualify for the $4,500 credit. 

This type of revision will accomplish the fuel conservation and environmental goals of the bill and will also remove the penalty from consumers who have a car that is operating at much less of a fuel efficiency than the government’s standardized estimates suggests. 

For more information on the No Cash for Clunkers petition, consumers are encouraged to visit http://www.nocashforclunkers.com/